AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Parallels vs virtualbox1/23/2024 ![]() ![]() This test determines how fast the graphics card can perform while still accurately rendering the scene. The second CineBench test evaluates the performance of the computer’s graphics card using OpenGL to render a 3D scene while a camera moves within the scene. The result produces a reference performance grade for the computer using a single processor, a grade for all CPUs and cores, and an indication of how well multiple cores or CPUs are utilized. The test is performed with a single CPU or core and then repeated using all available CPUs and cores. The first test uses the CPU to render a photorealistic image, using CPU-intensive computations to render reflections, ambient occultation, area lighting and shading, and more. The first, CineBench 10, performs a real-world test of a computer’s CPU, and its graphics card’s ability to render images. ![]() We’re going to use two different, popular, cross-platform benchmark test suites. GeekBench 2.1.4 and CineBench R10 are the benchmark applications we will use in our tests. To answer the question, we are going to perform benchmark tests to see how well the three major virtualization environments fare running Windows. The combination of these services and resource sharing tends to limit how well the virtualized OS can run. Also, OS X has to provide some services to the virtualization environment, such as windowing and core services. Since the virtual environment is running at the same time as the 'built-in' OS (OS X, now macOS), there has to be sharing of hardware resources. We say ‘near-natural’ because all virtualization environments have some overhead that can’t be avoided. Do the three major players in virtualization on the Mac - Parallels Desktop for Mac, VMWare Fusion, and Sun VirtualBox - live up to the promise of near-natural performance? Instead, the Windows or Linux software can run directly on the hardware, producing speeds that can be nearly as fast as if the guest OS was running on the PC.Īnd that’s the question our benchmarks tests seek to answer. Virtualization is similar in concept to emulation, but because Intel-based Macs use the same hardware as standard PCs, there’s no need to create a hardware abstraction layer in software. Parallels, and later VMWare and Sun, brought this capability to the Mac with virtualization technology. If you want to run Windows directly on a Mac as an option at bootup, you can use Boot Camp, an application that Apple provides as a handy way to install Windows in a multi-boot environment.īut many users need a way to run the Mac OS and a second OS simultaneously. In its place came the ability to run other OSes directly on an Intel Mac. With the advent of Apple’s decision to use Intel processors, the entire need for emulation was swept away. The result was an emulation environment that could run Windows or Linux but was severely restricted in both performance and the operating systems that could be used. ![]() In essence, the abstraction layer had to create software equivalents of video cards, hard drives, serial ports, etc. This abstraction layer not only had to translate for CPU type but also all of the hardware components. Even before Intel arrived, emulation software was available that allowed Mac users to run Windows and Linux.īut emulation was slow, using an abstraction layer to translate x86 programming code to the code used by the PowerPC architecture of earlier Macs. Virtualization environments have been hot commodities for the Mac user ever since Apple started using Intel processors in its computers. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |